🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours before the NYC mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange made a bold forecast – going beyond the winner citywide, and precinct by precinct. The analyst, an expert in elections who grew up in the city, has spent more than ten years in left-leaning activism and has become a kind of local celebrity recently for his deep dives into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He published his highly detailed prediction map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate was victorious while missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his Substack, the Narrative War. Lange has a flair for clever terms. He pointed out, for instance, the divide between the progressive stronghold, stretching from one neighborhood to another area to Astoria, where he forecasted (correctly) that Mamdani would win by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal outrank the mainstream paper” in readership and the majority of electors favored the independent, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Patterns and Surprises

What was your election night?

I had to do that since they were adding around 200,000 ballots into the system frequently! I felt a little nervous at the beginning: Mamdani led the initial ballots by 12 points, but came large groups of ballots that came in after that and his lead dropped from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, it was possible where yesterday turned out kind of poorly for Mamdani, where the opponent was going to end up basically increasing his support from the earlier contest. But the winner gained 500,000 votes to his initial base, and this was critical why he won. He campaigned and massively expanded his support from the primary.

Expanding Support

How did the mayor-elect gain additional support from?

He built the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: diverse racially, youthful, it’s renters and individuals facing cost pressures. He gained significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the earlier election. Plus he boosted his base of liberal progressives, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He built the coalition that the left always wanted to build: multiracial, youthful, renters and residents struggling with costs

Additionally, there were some Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a real thing, limited to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Voters in immigrant strongholds that went for the former president previously backed the progressive now. However it’s not that he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Turnout and Impact

A major development of the election was the sky-high participation. Who benefited?

Both sides. Turnout was much greater than I had expected. I figured we might exceed 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – which is a lot of darn voters. There was a substantial opposition group, who were motivated, but his supporters was also motivated, and that was enough to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Currently it appears he’s favored to get over 50%. He’s at just over 50% but remain around 200K ballots uncounted at that time. So it’s not it’s definitive, but I think probable, and I wish he achieves it because afterwards no one can say Sliwa was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His vote plummeted.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any area. Including one neighborhood in Staten Island, which is like an 88% Trump neighborhood. That truly surprised me. The independent kept very white areas, affluent zones and devout communities, and plus gained many Republicans on the island who had a high participation. I believe occurred a lot of tactical voting by GOP voters. They were doing it prior to Trump endorsed for Cuomo, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide if the winning alliance failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your much mentioned left-wing base – did backing for the candidate dominant in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think there was a little dilution of the commie corridor in certain places like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. There, for example, the property owners and residents all went for Cuomo. So there existed some opposition. But no, largely the leftist base is a key factor why Zohran won – he scored between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the election there was coverage on if the candidate was making inroads with the community. Any indication that he succeeded?

There are neighborhoods with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. However in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Manhattan area, his position on Israel definitely mattered in those places. Likewise in the moderate communities like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored Cuomo. And also, there are Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were pretty staunchly Cuomo. So it’s unclear if existed crazy narrative-busters here, but Mamdani retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city represents in politics? Will progressive base become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest political leaders from progressives come from a few areas in the boroughs. I believe that we’ll see more of that – people will emerge from these areas to be elevated nationally.

But I think that every city in the US can have similar progressive hubs. Cities are the centers of leftwing power in the nation – since youth reside there, people rent and they represent locales where people are crushed by the inequalities we face.