🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “complete double standards” for lobbying against tobacco control measures in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

Campaign in Zambia

Documents seen by journalists sent from the corporation's branch in Zambia to the African officials demands measures restricting tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be abandoned or delayed.

The corporation is pursuing amendments to a proposed legislation that include lowering the suggested dimensions of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on flavored smoking items, and diminished punishments for any companies violating the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“As an elected official, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” stated the health advocate.

Thousands of residents a year die from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to global health agency statistics.

The campaigner stated the letter was known to have been circulated to multiple official agencies and was in circulating through public interest organizations.

Global industry interference concerns

The situation emerges alongside expanded apprehension about business sector influence with public health regulations. In recent weeks, global health authorities issued a warning that the smoking product companies was intensifying efforts to undermine international regulations.

“There is proof of industry lobbying everywhere. Tobacco company fingerprints are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN high-level meeting,” commented Jorge Alday.

Potential consequences

“When public health regulation isn’t passed because of this letter, the cost might be borne in lives of people who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The public health measure going through Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and mandating that graphic health warnings cover 75% of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

Via documentation, the corporation proposes this be decreased to 30% or 50% “within the WHO-FCTC guideline limits”, delayed for at least twelve months after the bill passes.

International experts actually suggests a caution must occupy at least 50% of the product container front “and aim to cover as much of the principal display areas as possible”. Within Britain, warnings need to encompass sixty-five percent of a product container sides.

Flavored tobacco discussion

BAT asks for the elimination of comprehensive limitations on flavored cigarette varieties, suggesting that it would drive users to “illegally traded” products. The company proposes restricting fewer varieties of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The draft bill recommends punishments for various offences “ranging from a portion of yearly revenue to ten-year jail sentences”.

Corporate defense

Through correspondence, the company executive of British American Tobacco Zambia states the corporation is focused on ethical business practices” and “supports the objectives of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the related medical consequences” but claims that “some regulations can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Campaigner rebuttal

Chimbala said BAT’s proposed changes would “dilute these regulations so much that the impact needed for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that numerous similar measures were present in the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he stated.

“We reside in a international community. When I cultivate smoking products in my garden and gather the crop and sell it out – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to benefit personally and all the future family lines while my neighbor's family are succumbing … is in itself complete moral bankruptcy.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the Britain or other nations had not caused companies to close, the campaigner stated. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. It only protects the people.”

Formal company response

A BAT Zambia spokesperson stated: “The company operates its activities following with current country statutes. Further, the company participates in the state's regulatory development in line with the relevant frameworks which provide for interested party involvement in regulation development.”

The firm positioned itself as “not resisting legislation”, the representative commented, mentioning that minors should be safeguarded against acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We champion evolving legislation to realize planned community wellbeing objectives, while acknowledging the spectrum of privileges and responsibilities on businesses, users and involved parties,” they said, adding that the corporation's recommendations “mirror the circumstances of the Zambian market and smoking product business, which includes growing volumes of illegal commerce”.

The country's office of economic activities and commercial operations was contacted for response.